★★★★★

Like watching an old monster movie with your grandpa, if your grandpa were Mel Brooks. Hilarious!

Brandon L.

Wisconsin

It’s easy to dismiss Dracula: Dead and Loving It (1995) as just another late-entry parody, a final gasp in Mel Brooks’ long line of genre spoofs. And yes, on its face, this film can feel like a simple string of slapstick gags stitched together with fangs and fake blood. But watch it again, especially with fresh eyes, and you’ll find a loving tribute to old-school horror, filled with underrated charm, meticulous attention to genre detail, and a perfectly deadpan Leslie Nielsen.

At BoxReview.com, we believe in giving films a second look, especially ones that were misunderstood or overlooked in their time. Dracula: Dead and Loving It might not have landed with critics in 1995, but there's more to love here than you'd expect, especially if you're a fan of both classic Universal horror and Mel Brooks’ signature comedic style.

Plot Summary (Spoiler-Free):

As you might expect, Dracula: Dead and Loving It is a direct parody of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, borrowing heavily from the 1931 Bela Lugosi film in both structure and visual style. Leslie Nielsen plays Count Dracula with a mix of gravitas and ridiculousness, arriving in England to wreak havoc (and seduce) with the help of his trusty bug-eating assistant, Renfield (played hilariously by Peter MacNicol).

Meanwhile, Dr. Van Helsing (Mel Brooks himself) suspects the truth and aims to stop Dracula from claiming young Mina (Amy Yasbeck) and Lucy (Lysette Anthony) as his eternal brides.

If you've seen Young Frankenstein, you'll feel right at home, but the laughs here are less bawdy and more rooted in old-school physical comedy, wordplay, and visual gags.

What Most Reviews Miss: This Is Actually a Love Letter to Classic Horror

One thing most reviews don’t give the film credit for is how seriously it treats the aesthetic of old horror movies. Brooks doesn't just spoof Dracula, he recreates the Gothic look and feel of the original films with surprising authenticity. The sets are grand and shadowy. The costumes are richly period-accurate. Even the lighting evokes the silent era and early talkies.

It’s clear Brooks loves the material he’s parodying. This isn’t just a vampire spoof; it’s a movie for fans of Dracula, Hammer Films, and Universal monsters. In that way, it feels less like a broad comedy and more like a nostalgic stage play, one that happens to have buckets of blood and banana-peel-level pratfalls.

Leslie Nielsen’s Subtle Brilliance

We all know Nielsen as the king of deadpan humor thanks to Airplane! and The Naked Gun. But in Dracula: Dead and Loving It, he does something different. He’s not just spoofing Dracula, he’s actually playing him fairly straight, which makes the humor land harder. His Dracula is regal, awkward, charmingly out of place, and just a little clueless.

One of the film’s funnier subtleties is how Nielsen captures the awkwardness of immortality. His Dracula doesn’t seem especially evil; he’s just deeply out of step with the modern (or Victorian) world. That running theme of fish-out-of-water absurdity carries a lot of the film’s best jokes.

Peter MacNicol’s Renfield: The True Scene-Stealer

Let’s take a moment to appreciate what might be one of the most underrated comedic performances of the '90s: Peter MacNicol’s completely unhinged, twitchy, bug-devouring Renfield. His physical comedy is off-the-charts, but it’s his timing and facial expressions that elevate every scene he’s in.

His descent into madness, complete with wild monologues, jailhouse meltdowns, and yes, a few well-timed pratfalls, gives the film a manic energy that never quite lets up.

Honestly, he brings Young Frankenstein’s Igor energy to this film in the best way.

The Humor: Subtle, Slapstick, and Surprisingly Clean

By 1995, parody films were moving toward edgier, raunchier territory (Scary Movie was just a few years away), but Dracula: Dead and Loving It sticks to the clean, classic humor of Brooks’ earlier works. There are no cheap sex jokes or shock-value moments, just a lot of timeless wordplay, running gags, and comic exaggeration.

Some of the humor does miss the mark (the “stake through the heart” gag goes on a bit too long), but overall, the film sticks to what Brooks does best: satire with a wink, not a punch.

Why It Deserves a Rewatch Today

When it was first released, Dracula: Dead and Loving It got panned for being “tired,” “uninspired,” or “too safe.” But with almost 30 years of distance, it’s easier to see it for what it really is: a gentle, lovingly crafted farewell from one of comedy’s greats to a genre he clearly adored.

In an era dominated by CGI horror, self-serious vampire dramas, and meta-slasher satire, there's something refreshingly low-stakes and warm-hearted about this film. It doesn’t want to scare you. It doesn’t want to shock you. It just wants to make you smile and maybe wince at a few gallons of bright red stage blood.

Final Thoughts from Box Review

At BoxReview.com, we often talk about intent. Not every film has to reinvent the wheel; some just want to remind you of why you fell in love with movies in the first place. Dracula: Dead and Loving It is silly, sweet, and a little clunky, but it’s also genuine, nostalgic, and kind of irresistible if you let it be.

It may not be Brooks’ best, but it's certainly one of his most sincere. If you grew up watching old Dracula movies or Young Frankenstein, this film feels like a familiar hug, albeit one with fangs.

Box Score: 7.8/10

A goofy, affectionate Dracula parody that serves more as a love letter to horror history than a full-blown comedy classic, and that’s okay.

Watch Now on Amazon!